Argument,counter argument and refutation

Wild animal should not be kept in the zoo
Argument 1:
Living condition in the zoo is not as good as natural environment.
In the zoo,wild animals are kept in narrow cages that are not swept and cleaned regularly.In addition,food is not enough for the developing of wild animals.
For example,a tiger can eat 27kg meat per day,but in the zoo,people can’t supply much meat like that.
The most important thing is that animals also need freedom,so natural enviroment is the most suitable place for them
Argument 2:
Keeping wild animals in the zoo is very dangerous.
The cage,especially cage for dangerous animal,is not enough safe.In some zoos,the cages are just surrounded 4 sides.In above,there are nothing to prevent the animals to escape from cages.It’s very dangerous if one of animals escape from the cage,he or she can attack any one because there are always many people in the zoo.In media transportation usually have some news about wild animals attack people.
For example,in Dai Nam,Thu Dau Mot,Binh Duong province,there were a case that tiger killed a zoo keeper and injured another one.
Counter argument:
Many people have argued that keeping wild animals in the zoo is a way to preserve them from extinction as well as to maintain rare animals race.
Refutation:
The environment and living condition in the zoo is very difficult for wild animals to give birth.